BLUE 1,026 Posted August 20, 2014 (edited) Posted by Mike Florio on August 19, 2014, 8:29 PM EDT As it has grown and grown and grown some more, the NFL has continued to find more and more and more revenue streams. The latest could be the Super Bowl halftime show. Currently a gig the performer plays for free in order to turn a gigantic international platform into the high profile and profits that go with it, the league now wants a cut. According to the Wall Street Journal (via SportsBusiness Daily), the NFL has asked the three artists under consideration for the Super Bowl XLIX halftime show to “contribute a portion of their post-Super Bowl tour income” to the NFL, or to “make some other type of financial contribution.” Per the report, the idea received a “chilly reception” from the representatives of Katy Perry, Rihanna, and Coldplay. Regardless, it only takes one performer to bite the hook in order for the NFL to parlay the halftime show into even more of a moneymaker. And it’s entirely possible that the league leaked the development in order to pressure one of the three to blink, given that plenty of other performers who would gladly give up a piece of a pie they otherwise don’t have will now be calling the league to offer whatever the league wants for the privilege of playing to one of the biggest audiences in TV history. Source: ProFootballTalk Edited August 20, 2014 by BLUE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SteVo+ 3,702 Posted August 20, 2014 Greedy fuckin' bastards. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vin+ 3,121 Posted August 20, 2014 We're going to be stuck with Katy Perry, Rihanna, or Coldplay? Ewwwwww. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barracuda 629 Posted August 20, 2014 We're going to be stuck with Katy Perry, Rihanna, or Coldplay? Ewwwwww. I'm all for it if someone much more tolerable is willing to pony up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FartWaffles 1,857 Posted August 20, 2014 We're going to be stuck with Katy Perry, Rihanna, or Coldplay? Ewwwwww. If it comes down to those three, hopefully it's Katy Perry. At least she is easy on the eyes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AL_Royalty 489 Posted August 20, 2014 If it comes down to those three, hopefully it's Katy Perry. At least she is easy on the eyes. Yeah, I have no problem with a Katy Perry halftime show. That is one bad ass woman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BC 331 Posted August 20, 2014 i could do katy perry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zack_of_Steel+ 3,014 Posted August 20, 2014 So, basically they're guaranteeing that the halftime show will continue to be irrelevant, unwatchable shit. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SteVo+ 3,702 Posted August 20, 2014 If it comes down to those three, hopefully it's Katy Perry. At least she is easy on the eyes. And she'll probably wear something--shall we say--revealing? So I'm down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FartWaffles 1,857 Posted August 20, 2014 And she'll probably wear something--shall we say--revealing? So I'm down. Hope so! My girlfriend is a big fan of hers. (what chick isn't?) We saw her perform in Houston a few years ago. Let's just say I enjoyed the show, because of her wardrobe decisions. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cobresol 18 Posted August 22, 2014 I would pay money to the NFL if they dropped the Super Bowl halftime spectacle or merely produced one that wasn't a complete waste of time. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FL Colt Fan 8 Posted August 23, 2014 Halftime to me is stretch out, wizz, refill drink and food and wait for the action to start again. I do watch whatever is remaining, but why can't the NFL come up with something that appeals to a broader audience? The Bands can't please everyone. Come up with some thing more entertaining. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites