butta54 371 Posted April 26, 2016 Stanley isn't as athletic as Tunsil. That's about the only thing Dmac said that I can agree with. However, with that being said....Stanley is a heck of an athlete. He is great in space and easily gets downfield. He has basketball feet. Handling speed off the edge wasn't a big problem for him, and I think he has more strength than Tunsil. His technique in the run game helps him look even more dominant because he uses proper leverage more times than not. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DonovanMcnabb for H.O.F 2,241 Posted April 26, 2016 You don't have to agree with me on who better handles contact, more agile, more explosive, etc, when it comes to Booker Vs. Zeke. The stats agree, the measurable agree, the tape, the fumbles, the health, etc etc etc etc. Literally the one area Booker may have an argument for being superior to Elliott is receiving. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cherry 1,302 Posted April 26, 2016 You don't have to agree with me on who better handles contact, more agile, more explosive, etc, when it comes to Booker Vs. Zeke. The stats agree, the measurable agree, the tape, the fumbles, the health, etc etc etc etc. Literally the one area Booker may have an argument for being superior to Elliott is receiving. Fine by me. We see what we see. The funny thing is I actually see Zeke as a better receiver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
