-
Content Count
1,655 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Posts posted by GA_Eagle
-
-
Ice cream.
-
I know its in black and white (or at least it seems highly unsaturated) but I hope they keep at least a little bit of gold on there. Somewhere.
Here's one with color, though it looks added after the fact.
- 2
-
I hate the giant quote box but Brady has done well behind bad lines before. I don't see why he couldn't excel in Seattle if he was on that team.
-
Beer. Tv.
-
Who really liked Now you See Me ? Seems like something I'd thoroughly enjoy.
Was decent, but not as good as I was hoping.
-
Yea. Did someone say otherwise? I skimmed so if they did, I missed it.
Here's how I think about the two. I know exactly what I get with Romo. He's a very very good QB and someone that can carry a team, but he's unlikely to get any better. He's a better passer than Cam, and probably Cam will never be as good a passer, but I've been wrong before. Romo has had int issues in the past, that still creep up on him when he's under pressure.
Cam is the more dynamic player with his legs and can make things happen on offense that Romo can't because of this. He also can overcome lesser offensive talent a little better. His potential to get better makes him more alluring if I'm starting a team.
I honestly am not sure who I would pick if all other things are equal. They are close enough that I would really have to think about it. I think for one game or even a season, I would lean Romo, but I'm not positive. If it were for the forseeable future the answer is obviously Cam, but that's more obvious just given their respective ages.
-
Gonna need more than 10 good games to determine that. Sorry.
Guess I'm saying stats are cool and all but let's move on since there are other things to look at, such as Foles short career length. Another example big bens accumulated stats are pretty similar to Romo throughout their careers. I would take Ben in a heartbeat though.
The two guys you're comparing are similar enough that there's a valid conversation so there's no need to be dismissive because romo had a slightly better statistical season.
- 2
-
Nick Foles has better stats than either of them. Is he better?
-
Seriously. Moar
-
100 browns 1310
200 raiders 4500
200 texans 4500
500 falcons 15500
500 eagles 25000
500 ravens 25000
500 steelers 22500
Might wanna check my math
-
Roughly the same as Blue.
-
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
-
If so, how bout just make it one. I don't need the whole string. Anyone who post a lot from a phone will know what an ass pain it is.
-
Ghostbusters cause greatest comedy ever.
-
I go in strange alternating waves of paranoia and complete comfort with technology and all that it brings. Often its within seconds of each other. I love gadgets and the internet... then I think about someone looking at all those NAMBLA emails I sent and I freak out a bit.
Seriously. It makes me kinda paranoid and helpless feeling.
-
The obvious answer is Aaron Murray. Cuz he will be.
-
-
Think its a bad move, if they do it. They have plenty of holes to fill still. Sure pass rusher is one of the biggest. Its a big risk at the least. Even if he pans out right away they could really use the help elsewhere and are really low on depth.
-
Pretty much all the things everyone said put me in a good mood. I walk my dog right around dawn whenever I can. It helps.
-
I guess the big question, because I like the idea, is what will you "buy" with your tgp bucks? Are the things at the bottom things you have to use to buy or are they just suggestions for things to buy? do you have to use all of them?
-
If it exists, do it! That thing was the bomb.
-
What's the point? We all know Foles is the best of the group.
- 1
- 1
-
Happy birthday!
-
I second this idea. I'd rather be a trendsetter.That's why I wanted Silver and Gold because it's original. >_>
fuckers
Then we'd come out looking like fucking Prince. Why don't we just wear assless pants as part of our uniform?
Could make the QB / center exchange a bit uncomfortable but why not?
Weekly Discussion Topic: May 11-17 (Depression)
in The Sideline
Posted · Edited by GA_Eagle
I've never head the kind of depression I think of as medically treatable. People get sad/ depressed for all sorts of reasons, and that's normal and can sometimes even lead to severe actions but I didn't think that was necessarily something that was treatable with pills, more of a situation in which counseling or if we're talking about normal level of sadness, maybe just normal coping techniques (throwing things, crying, time alone - whatever works for you) will work.
I always thought of real depression as something more than having the blues over something that happened like a break up or a death or something else sad or stressful, at least the kind people should be taking pills for. I can't say that I've ever had that. Everyone gets sad over stuff but I was always under the impression that most will get over it without becoming really depressed, at least not clinically depressed.