BUCK3Y3

RZB. Get off me bruh

When you gonna put out next week's games?

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UxUbobLqYsY Can we start a petition on change.org to have her put down? Think of the children! It's for the best. Her dad must be so proud of his creation.

9/10 53 Points

Maybe I gave SDSU too much credit. Eastern Illinois embarrassed them.

28 years young.

Lol nah. There was no way they were losing. They just didn't win pretty. Even though they won by 20.

Just wondering how leaks like this make Snowden a hero.

I don't need my hand held. I'm talking about the mass of idiots who have 2 second memories.

Scores Tulsa 7 - Bowling Green 34 Rutgers 51 - Fresno State 52 Florida Atlantic 6 - Miami 34 Purdue 7 - Cincinnati 42 Louisiana Tech 14 - North Carolina State 40 Syracuse 17 - Penn State 23 BYU 16 - Virginia 19 Washington State 24 - Auburn 31 #5 Georgia 35 - #8 Clemson 38 #12 LSU 37 - #20 TCU 27

They are going to get blasted in the locker room. If they play like that next week SDSU could beat them. SDSU isn't half bad. I do not see the amount of dumb penalties they had today continuing going forward. Roby comes back next week as well. Granted the secondary really wasn't that bad. The young guys on the d-line are gonna have to progress quickly.

The top 10 is a toss up for me outside of Alabama at #1. I think Ohio State is a little overrated at #2 but they belong in the top 5. Their defense is a question mark for me after losing some key guys. Number 2 for me would be either Stanford or Georgia. I would probably give the nod to Stanford at #2 because they are a very balanced football team but their success hinges on Hogan. Georgia played exceptionally well last year aside from the loss to South Carolina who I'm still not sold on. Their defense and offense really developed late into the season. I got Georgia at #3 Oregon and Ohio State are almost neck and neck for me. I'm going to put Ohio State at #4 because they are returning everyone on offense and have added a few playmakers. I look for Dontre Wilson to add another wrinkle to the offense alongside Braxton Miller. I don't know how Chip Kelly's exit will affect Oregon so I would drop Oregon to #5. I have Louisville at #6 based on their performance against Florida in the bowl game. I got South Carolina #7 and Florida #8. I do not expect A&M to perform as well this year as they did last year. Mainly because the off season happenings with Manziel. Even if he doesn't end up missing any time I don't know if they will be able to focus with the Manziel circus. I would put Florida State at #9 and drop A&M to #10. I really think its wide open below Alabama. It should be a really good season and there will likely be a lot of movement in the Top 25. I'm sure a lot of people would disagree with my Top 10 but its preseason. I welcome disagreements because it means college football talk and I'm all about it. Lets talk college football!

Defense has a lot of work to do. Offensive line as well. 1st game of the year they won by 20 but no way Meyer is satisfied with that mess. Young guys got a long way to go. Hopefully most of it can be attributed to the fact its the first game of the year. Braxton looked good throwing. WRs had a few drops but looked decent. Hall was a beast. Special team outside of Corey Brown bobbling every kick he received looked ok. Lots and lots of dumb penalties. I know that can be fixed. They didn't do as well as they should have but I'm confident by years end they will be better. I said from the beginning of the year they were overrated at #2. Not sure they are even top 5 at this point in time. Sloppy football for sure.

In Weeden Em' Out

Meh I don't really care for Snowden. His leaks haven't really been that surprising to me. If I were him I would be using my stage to speak to the American people more to try and introduce real change. He isn't really doing that.

The option you were looking for is NO. If you agree with Vin. The contribution of humans as far as the amount of greenhouse gases goes is marginal. What I don't hear discussed a lot is outgassing. Outgassing is the release of a gas that was dissolved, trapped, frozen or absorbed in some material.[1] As an example, research has shown how the concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere has sometimes been linked to ocean outgassing. So just because of the Earths natural climate cycle the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will increase. It gets hotter, ice melts and carbon dioxide is released (just one example). So the increases in carbon dioxide aren't necessarily the cause of rising temperatures. As the temperature rises naturally carbon dioxide is released from the Earth. Much data has been ignored and falsified by the global warming alarmists. Why would anyone perpetuate falsehoods about the Earths climate? I believe the answer is big business. They are gaining the most from global warming. You have all these green products out there and people are being beat down with inaccurate data by alarmists so they are just trying to "do their part" for the environment. Meanwhile the rich get richer. Call me a conspiracy theorists or whatever you want, but this is what I believe. Scientists get funding for research from government and big business. So is it really that much of a reach that some scientist would be inclined to skew data in order to please the people funding them? The best way to get more funding is show results with what you've been given. I'm not blaming any particular political party for anything. Global warming is real. The degree of which some claim human beings contribute to it is absolute bullshit. Look at Mars for example. It is believed that Mars once had life and that it had flowing water and maybe oceans. Now its a barren rock. Climates naturally change as time goes on. Earths history shows us this. Carbon dioxide levels were higher at points before mankind came about than what they are right now.

Fresno State

Heard him on the radio today. Said he's fine.

Shouldn't this post be in other sports section?

Looks like I'm the only one that took bowling green.

ESPN

Last years pick'em didn't really count cause I wasn't here. Someone won by default.

They are talking like this could be his opportunity to lock down the starting job over Flynn. While Pryor is still rough around the edges he has progressed somewhat as a passer. I've seen him make some really good passes, but I've seen him make bad ones as well. His biggest problem is easily decision making. The only way he is going to get better in that department is getting game reps. He definitely is dangerous with his legs. If I was a Raiders fan I would want Pryor to start. The Raiders are going to have an abysmal season its almost unavoidable but Pryor would be more entertaining to watch. He has potential. I shouldn't want Pryor to succeed and do well, but I do.

Exactly this is like the NCAA trolling everyone. Might as well say you didn't find shit.