BwareDWare94

Yeah his intentions were to hurt the poor. Right. That's exactly what he wanted.

Because political disagreements warrant being happy about someone's death. You and Sean are doing nothing more then celebrating the pain of his loved ones. This is a dangerous rabbit hole. You're going to soon have trouble looking in the mirror.

Lol I don't care. He was help captive and tortured for several years. He can refer to them as gooks if he wants to.

So McCain only referred to his captors--those who tortured him--as gooks? That's where this issue with his use of the word comes from? I have zero issue with his use of the word in that particular context. I would if he used it in a general sense.

We've all said racial slurs in our lives. If that makes one racist, we're all fucked.

He was no racist.

This is shitty of you, Sean. You're better than this

So far....5-0. Dear lord, I'm so glad I didn't waste any time watching that game

I guess Teddy doesn't even get a chance?

The issue is that under those protections the male students weren't even allowed due process in some cases. Colleges can't be dismissing students and affecting their futures without any real evidence. And while heinous crimes like rape sort of top the "worst of the worst" category, having your life altered over a false accusation isn't warranted or justified. It's easy to say "but it's rare" but what happens when it happens to you or someone you know? There needs to be real evidence. That should be the case. With the protections that were in place, individuals overseeing the cases were acting with bias and not doing sufficient investigating. And I repeat that there's nothing morally wrong or oppressive about opposing the practice of abortion. The right to snuff out a developing life is not some sort of inalienable human right. As for puberty blockers, in my opinion it's too dangerous for developing minds, especially when most youth trans cases turn out to be nothing more than a phase. It's sort of the other side of the false accusation likelihood...if the potential risk is much greater than the potential benefit, why would a sane person allow their child to go through it?

Not garbage, just a different perspective that's equally viable.

College and some people I've kept in touch with since then. I don't take issue with them--i take issue with the ridiculous elements of the LGBWTF discussion right now. Also, the WTF is for all the stupid non-existent sexualities and absurd identities like non-binary and gender fluid and especially the really, really stupid ones like animal kin. I don't think trans itself is a mental illness but I do think there's a mental illness aspect, evidenced by the high rates of depression and anxiety that come with the condition.

...that's not how it works

You don't get to assign labels without evidence. Just because I don't support vague overreach laws doesn't mean I don't support gay rights. Also, stop pretending you're a reasonable, intelligent human being if you aren't going to be more open to opposing ideas and less willing to demonstrably use hyperbole and libel as a defense mechanism against conservative viewpoints you can't refute and/or prove to be wrong. You've done nothing but insult Ngata with your responses. It's a shame. And fruitless. Pretty soon you're going to need the fire department to get you down from your high horse.

And likelihood of false accusations has no effect on whether or not a false accusation should be given the benefit of the doubt. She said is not enough evidence of wrongdoing

Which sexual assault protections? Because it sure seems that the general campus policy is she said it so he is guilty. Only recently have Male students begun to actually win the right to go back to school whenever allegations don't actually add up. And he barred trans folks from military service at the direction of others within the military, not of his own observation and deduction.

For once....FOR ONCE....could you not tell a lie in this regard? Trump has shown no indication of being against either. What has Trump done that has threatened Women's rights? Be pro-life? There is nothing morally wrong with opposing the practice of abortion. What has Trump done that's actually threatened LGBWTF rights? Nothing. He just doesn't entertain stupid laws, irrational rhetoric, and PC nonsense. It's refreshing. And to suggest he's a white supremacist is why he was elected in the first place. Too many Americans were sick of the left slinging terms like "White Supremacist" and "Nazi" around. Because it wasn't honest. It's slander. It's libel. Period.

Difference being that said Baker offered to sell them an undecorated cake that they could decorate as they please but they were insistent that he custom make a cake celebrating a homosexual union, which goes against his religious beliefs. He had every right to refuse to do that specific task. He did not refuse them service overall. And I don't care about Alex Jones but censorship is always bad. That being said, it was and should be within their rights to not host his content.

Yeah Cherry's boy is done.

The league needs more trash talk. This is great

How about a law dictating that after one no show a person can be fired barring proof of an emergency scenario?

I'm not so much comparing myself to anybody...it's jobs I've had where people no call/no show all the time and the bosses had to "write them up!" like 16 times before termination was "approved" by higher ups. I'm talking about mostly in workplaces where there's a structured hierarchy. Obviously my farm doesn't qualify as that. It's mainly other jobs I've had. Blots is right on one thing--my comment is based on experience, but it's not just a "minor" inconvenience for a crew that's supposed to be 15 have only have 6-8 on hand to do 15 guys' worth of work.

Honestly, if they pass any new labor laws, just let employers fire shitty employees without needing to jump through 600 hoops

Which gay right(s) are we considering endangered?

Not to mention that it being just a phase is by far the most likely outcome.