BwareDWare94

What's reasonable? There are certain sports where equal pay is impossible. If that undeniable fact is conceded from the beginning, we can find the places with it's possible and implement it.

A major problem with Democrats in 2019 is that they not only believe that they're correct about everything, they also believe they're the intellectual superiors of our society by default. Why else did they allow an open disdain for the Midwest and for rural voters after Hillary lost? This complete dismissal of differing perspectives, especially about hot-button issues, is and will continue to be their political undoing. This open arrogance turned off swing voters during the 2016 election season. It turned off moderate voters like myself who are neverTrumpers in a moral sense but are not guaranteed Dem votes, and it is doing the same things during this election season. Donald Trump is going to win rather easily in 2020, and it could be a landslide victory. Until Democrats jump off the hyperbole and superiority bandwagon, they'll continue to fail. They're doing things Republicans have done from other perspectives for years, things they've called Republicans out for, and despite their sure belief in their intellectual superiority, they're not smart enough to realize it. Pot, meet Kettle.

Biden did something shady and Trump did something shady in response. Two wrongs don't make a right, but I'm not going to get all up in arms over it. Democrats are acting like Trump ran over Biden's dog and bragged about, for Christ's sake. Moderate American voters are desensitized because these things get blown so far out of proportion.

This Ukraine thing wouldn't bother most of us no matter who was President. It's just not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things. I'm not personally bothered by it, but I also wouldn't have been bothered if President Obama had done something similarly. This Ukraine thing was never going to swing people. What should have swung people away from him was Stormy Daniels, because extra-marital affairs (forget just Stormy--Trump has many) should bother every single morally centered and emotionally stable person on the planet. Trump's immorality is exactly why I didn't vote for him and won't vote for him, but I refused to vote for Hillary and barring a complete surprise, I'll likely also refuse to vote for the Democratic candidate in 2020. To me, it's more important to have a better option to elect than it is to elect somebody other than Donald Trump. If Democrats provide a stomach-able, not absurdly radical about finances or social issues candidate, I'm in.

Our political and social climates are so interwoven now that truth bends to the will of the individual in question, and we're all guilty of it. The point at which our country progresses and improves is the point at which we rediscover what the word "truth" means. ^Interesting concept but I don't see any real revelation or obvious purpose.

THURSDAY Seahawks SUNDAY Cardinals Titans Bears Buccaneers Vikings Eagles Ravens Patriots Panthers Texans Chargers Cowboys Chiefs Monday

Turns out the 1% were hiding some of their wealth in Bernie Sanders's arteries. Too soon?

Who do the people like best if we were actually allowed to choose?

The Eagles are absolute fools if they don't keep feeding Jordan Howard and sprinkling in Miles Sanders. It doesn't matter how high Carson Wentz's ceiling is--every quarterback that's ever existed needs a running game. Green Bay needs to get their running game going. Three straight weeks of Jones being neutralized is eventually going to catch up to the offense. The Eagles pretty much need to either trade for another corner, or hope they can get healthy in the secondary, stay healthy, and improve as the season goes along. Green Bay's secondary is fucking awesome and underrated, but if they can't stop the run, it won't matter.

He wants to actually tax the shit out of the 1%, so yeah. Fuck 'em. They make a killing off of underpaying common man employees and overcharging common man customers. Bleed them dry.

No democratic candidates have come out against this as far as I know. It sets a dangerous precedent for our media, and our potential President, to do nothing to combat such nonsense. Also, this just makes me support Sanders over Warren even more than I already did.

And the transcript shows nothing impeachable, and yet the democratic news networks are running with it like it's some bombshell 🤣

Eagles at Packers Sunday Sept 29 Titans at Falcons Patriots at Bills Chiefs at Lions Raiders at Colts Chargers at Dolphins Redskins at Giants Browns at Ravens Panthers at Texans Buccaneers at Rams Seahawks at Cardinals Vikings at Bears Jags at Broncos Cowboys at Saints Monday night Bengals at Steelers point total= 31

I don't see an impeachment actually happening. If there was anything to worry about, Trump would be in full meltdown. Just another swing and a miss for Democrats. That's my gut feeling, anyway

Truck drivers? Regulation is more of a threat to drivers than automation. There are drivers in this country who can't make money for a variety of reasons. In some cases it's how they're contracted, others it's they can only work 40 hours. I mean, I completely agree with making sure these guys aren't exhausting themselves to the point of falling asleep behind the wheel of a big rig, but for fuck's sake, we're over-regulating them in some cases. You want to regulate semi drivers? Give them 3 strikes and lose their license for 10 years with speeding, take their license away for 5 years if you catch them blowing a stop sign, etc. The crazy fucks are more dangerous than the long hour guys.

As many of you know, I was staunchly liberal in my college years. Obviously, that's no longer the case, but the switch isn't as drastic as it appears to the reactionary eye. In an effort to not go TL;DR on you folks, and because I'm on mobile, I'll just pose a general question and we can expand into specifics if this thread gains steam. How do you make the separation between what's real and what isn't in regard to how radical liberalism/leftism approaches hot button topics like racism, sexism, oppression, LGBTQ issues. Those are just general examples. Feel free to dig on. And obviously we're not talking about whether these things are real as a whole. They exist, but the left blows them out of proportion, and the right minimizea them. Where, in the middle of those partisan tactics, do you find reality to be?

My exact experience.

Sadly, the only kinds of data on those issues are partisan, leaning whichever direction depending on the source.

"Less than one percent of rape claims are made falsely" Dude, that's not even remotely accurate. There are no facts that back up or even suggest that statistic. Come on.

Thursday, September 19 Titans Sunday, September 22 Bills Cowboys Packers Falcons Chiefs Vikings Patriots Eagles Panthers Bucs Chargers 49ers Seahawks Rams Monday, September 23 Redskins and total of Monday night game is= 41

That's what should happen to rapists but it's just too hard to prove with 100% certainty. I wish it were simpler. Based on the available evidence, he's innocent.

I don't give even the slightest shit what a person says in high school or college. And what are we referring to as perjuring himself?

There is literally no corroborating evidence for even Blasey-Ford's accusation. You're making an obvious stretch, there. And what exactly makes him a sleazeball? Is it that he hired an all female staff after being named to the SC? Is it the fact he hired more women on average throughout his career?

If we want to know why Donald Trump will be re-elected (and probably quite easily, at that), it'll be because of things like the NYT running with a clearly false new accusation against Brett Kavanaugh. As a matter of fact, he probably made onto SCOTUS because of all the silly, clearly fake secondary accusations that surfaced after Blasey-Ford's accusation, but she was the only one with an even slightly believable accusation, though it held very little water. People get irritated by shit like this. Shit like this swings moderate voters. Might as well expect 8 years of the Orange Man, at this point.

I guess we're going to agree to disagree. There are 5-8 RBs I'd take before McCaffrey. Other observations: 1. Minnesota can't have a kicker, I guess. Aside from one or two years of good Walsh, we haven't had a good kicker since Ryan Longwell. But let's call a spade a spade--the Vikings gave up on Daniel Carlson way too soon. 2. Carson Wentz has to get the Eagles offense into the red zone in the first quarter, moving forward. They can't keep having these slow starts. 3. Time to start fearing Dallas, imo. Yes, it's 2 games against two bad teams, but I think this might be the scariest offense seen in Dallas since the season of the catch. 4. All the analysts will blame Pittsburgh's 6-10 season on injuries. Hint: they weren't a good team even when healthy 5. I think Jacoby Brissett will be fine in Luck's place. The Colts will have to play a different style, though.