Omerta

Yeah I don't think homophobia is as rampant as people would have you believe. I think being gay is a massive benefit these days.

Maybe it's me seeing what I want but I know CONSERVATIVES voting for Tulsi because of their absolute hatred for Clinton, destruction of the ever privileged Kamala Harris, and her moderate policies and support of a free market with only slight moderations that won't effect most. Moderates love her, and she still gets some decent pull in liberal circles. It's the White Knight pussy and the people who are a slave to a cunt who don't like her. Everyone else can be convinced. I think this is a 3 horse race. We will see though

Yeah maybe in Iowa, but outside there people have no idea who this guy is or why a Mayor is neglecting the town he runs, to runf for president. Seriously most people in Seattle know the guys as the homo mayor or the gay mayor. Some people really hate him and I don't know why. Some people love him, because he is gay I presume, and most have no idea who the fuck he is lol.

I think Pete is gone. He is a shitty Mayor of a relatively small City that had regressed under him. He is done. I think it's a 4 person race. Tulsi, Yang, Bernie, and Warren. I think it's going to be hard to elect Bernie because of his health. So in effect it's 3.

What, we lost Beta? Say it isn't so

Harrison Smith is another person who should be in the Hall of very good. He is a great player, but when I think of the greatest safeties of the last 20 years he doesn't make the list, at least not in the top five.

Checkers rarely make it in. And USB stoned off your ass if you think Marshal yanda is not putting together a greater body of work than Justin Tucker at this point. yonder has played in the trenches for almost 14 years, most kickers don't have a career that long. Not to mention, he still doing it at a pro bowl or all pro level. is Justin Tucker puts together another 10 years, he'll absolutely be on this list, or at least should be.

Yanda. He is the best o line player, and maybe offensive player of his generation. Earl Thomas. Not for shit he did with us. Ronnie Stanley has an outside shot. He is the best LT in the league. Marlon Humphrey is playing like it, but it is too early to tell.

So Baghdadi is dead. Took his kids too. Trump accurately describes him, and also gave us the salacious details of it all. Glad the guys last moments were full of fear.

Dont this place is a shit hole.

So it is my favorite time of year and the office talk always revolves around the best horror franchise, and most of, although not all, horror credibility is the main antagonist for the franchise. So who do you have and why? Lets get a rank choice here. Top 5. 5th will get 1 point, and 1st will get 5 points. The other ones are irrelevant lol. 1.) Michael Myers (Halloween) Honestly this isnt even close to me. He was easily the best because of his presence. He did not have as much gore but the stalking and foreshadowing was intense. He had it all, the look, the unstoppable nature, the back story, the walk, just the best. 2.) Ghost Face. There was something about the perpetual nature of the mask. It wasnt so much the killers as what the mask represented to me. It was the mystery of it all, this was a whodunnit that could stay interesting even though it did not need a complete cast remake and the star heroine and her nemesis made this awesome. 3.) Jason Voorhees. He is pretty much a watered down Michael Myers, but a force to be reckoned with all the same. The backstory was good, but it all went to shit after the 3rd one, although Jason takes Manhattan had some redeeming qualities. 4.) Jigsaw. An actual flesh and blood human who used his wits to get people to appreciate their lives or exact revenge. IT was creative and brutal but completely plausible given the right circumstances. He could be killed and he was at one point, but he still found a way to test and inspire proteges. 5.) Candyman. I absolutely loved the premise of the original, I though it was an awesome way to introduce a movie antagonist. It was original and it capitalized on a visceral fear of the 90's kids who did this shit. He was a scary enough guy and the character was written well. The other 2 are shit in my opinion. Hellraiser was never scary to me and Freddie was just a loser ass pedo who was burned alive, but somehow attacked people while dreaming. I wouldnt mind doing more of these like best franchise, best one off horror movies, and so on. Come up with ideas you fucks.

I knew we would agree on Halloween, Michael is the GOAT. I do enjoy the foil characters that you brought up because that is an underrated part of the horror genre that people often forget. If there is just an unstoppable character there is no point to a movie because there is no drama. And if you think about how groundbreaking it was that a woman was the foil character, and a high school one at that. I think that had a lot to do with the fact that one of the writers was a woman (Debra Hill) and that she understood the high school dynamic. Loomis was one of the great character actors of his time, and I think Halloween was some of his best performances. When they did the voice-over for his characters for Haloween H20 (It wasn't him, but a voice actor), you can tell how much his voice was kind of a character of its own. When it comes to Freddy, I'll be honest I never saw the angle of how something like being a victim of being a pedophilia would haunt you years later, I never made the connection of that is why he does it in their dreams, and the haunting's are his playground. He is still a loser ass pedo, but I guess the villain of the movie is supposed to bring angst in some form, Freddy isn't really scary, but he is hate-able so you root for the kids. I would disagree that Freddy is his crown jewel, I would say it is probably Scream, but I could see how you would make that argument. Jason's lack of a foil character was both a strength and a weakness for me. He did have somewhat of a foil character though in Tommy Jarvis. The lack of a real foil character was kind of cool though because every movie you got to guess who was going to be the survivor girl. Although you could always tell in the first 5 minutes. It was always the sexually repressed nerd who didnt drink, thus enforcing the rules of horror. I thought Candyman was a strong Villain, although given the importance that you place on a foil character it probably isn't as great for you. As a side not, have you seen the Scream TV series ?

I didn't know if he was a traitor. I did say, and still maintain the fact that I think some part of him is an idiot. What he did was not nearly as bad as it was first reported to be, however, a couple of years ago when he was acting as surprised as you was at the backlash oh, I couldn't believe it. You expose government corruption on a mass scale, you don't think they're going to come after you? Or you try to be the anti-hero of the population and you don't think the government is going to bite back hard? He just comes off as a whiny prick.

That is touchy for me. It depends on what they blow the whistle on. If they are spoiling black ops missions, they should definitely prosecute. If it is some Edward Snowden shit where it is the government infringing on the constitutional rights of the American everyman, yeah they did a public service.

I didn't say that. You claim it's possible based on your grandma saying she was a little girl at 18. My great great grandmother has letters from family going back to the great potato famine in Ireland. Using your logic of your grandma using little girl.tonreference someone in their late teens.meams Hillary did, means my grandma keeping letters means Hillary should have. There is no positive message if it's sent by a liar, especially if it's bullshit.the message is pander, pander, pander, to suit the crowd you're in. Also the message would mean nothing because of who said it. If Trump tells boys about overcoming adversity its a bunk message because it comes from someone who is morally bankrupt and has never overcome adversity. There is no derangement syndrome. Everyone seems to think their is a higher probability of her lying than telling the truth except you, which is all well and good. But pretending anyone has facts here is dumb.

Sure buddy. Hillary wouldn't lie. It's more probable she is telling the truth instead of pandering to a crowd of women.

Oh for sure you have people who think she hung the moon. That said the party as a whole is leaving her. Bernie was the real leader, not Biden for the nomination. I personally think he is out now. If he is, he is going to endorse one of two people. Watered or Gabbard. Gabbard or Yang is their best shot at pulling moderates. I would say Gabbard because the military service go a long way with the right. If Bernie endorses Gabbard she becomes a powerhouse. As we speak Bernie peeps are looking at her. And policy for policy I think she is the best.

Haha look its that one guy with the punchable face who does more pandering to the crowd than any other candidate. He is that atypical beta cuck white guy who is talking about poke balls at a riot, sees a black guy, and starts yelling," BLACK LIVES MATTER, BLACK LIVES MATTER, BLACK LIVES MATTER, BLACK LIVES MATTER" Then as soon as the black guy leaves he runs home and thinks to himself how lucky he is he didnt have to make eye contact because he would have wet himself. I love his, we are going door to door speeches. Like, Bitch you aint doing shit. The first guy would smack you out of your boots and you would talk about your oppression in your next basket weaving class with the other women. This is Robert in his natural habitat:

I really think that Clinton is doing Tulsi a favor. Clinton is such a vile, loathsome, lying, piece of shit, cunt that so many people hate her they are going to start saying," Hey, I hate Hillary Clinton, this Gabbard lady has rustled her jimmy, she must be doing something right, let me go check it out." I cannot reiterate enough how much I absolutely hate that woman, and I am not alone. Her own party hates her sorry ass. I think this really could swing a lot of people to at least listen to Gabbard, if she does not win, then fine, but her message should be heard.

I think they absolutely lie to us on purpose. I guess we will disagree. On the Joe Rogan Podcast with a dogshit, confused, sack of shit reporter Bary Weiss from the New York Times, she straight admits it. She says she will run.stories she thinks are dubious just to get out there first, and retract it later if there is backlash. I don't know. I agree an eye for an eye probably isn't productive. Although I would be lying to you if I said I don't get some joy watching someone do to reporters what they do to everyone else. Honestly I would abolish the first amendment at this point before the second. Freedom of the press is all great and all until their in bed with the people who make the rules.

You should go to prison for this. The longer my wife does this the more discouraging it is. To her patient care is numero uno. There is nothing else, and it's frustrating to me because she will come home crying some days because follow up care is so poor and nurses suck ass. Admittedly she is adorable when she gets fiesty. That said as a doctor people are entrusting you with their lives or the lives of their loved ones. Any shady dealings like that should get you in the clink. That is why your salary is so high, because the outcomes of your decisions are magnified.

I can see that, but here is the philosophical question at play here. Given the degradation of the standards in media you should be suspect of all news because they all pretty much suck. So if someone suspects someone is doing some shady shit, and maybe leaks a false story, like major news organizations, to get them investigated, how wrongt is it ? If it's true you did a bad thing with net good results. If you don't you retract it, and it's a way, with maybe a slight lean negative. So is it worth it? I don't know, but it's interesting.

I can get behind it in principle though. The idea to use undercover reporting to expose corruption is something I love on a lot of levels. It is brilliant strategically as well if all the corrupt people can't trust phone repairmen. They would have to circle the wagons for survival and the will have isolated themselves. He is a sleaze, but again the principle I can get behind. Tulsi supporting something like that is not a bad thing necessarily. I will say if that's the only flaw she has, she is far and away the best candidate.

You only say that because O'Keefe is "conservative." In reality I like the idea. I love the fact that Tulsi will reach across the aisle. She could be extremely successful if elected