Supreme Court Rejects Damages For Innocent Man Who Spent 14 Years On Death Row

[Favre4Ever+ 4,476]

Supreme Court rejects damages for innocent man who spent 14 years on death row

 

A bitterly divided Supreme Court on Tuesday tossed out a jury verdict won by a New Orleans man who spent 14 years on death row and came within weeks of execution because prosecutors had hidden a blood test and other evidence that would have proven his innocence.

 

The 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas shielded the New Orleans district attorney's office from being held liable for the mistakes of its prosecutors. The evidence of their misconduct did not prove "deliberate indifference" on the part of then-Dist. Atty. Harry Connick Sr., Thomas said.

 

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg emphasized her disapproval by reading her dissent in the courtroom, saying the court was shielding a city and its prosecutors from "flagrant" misconduct that nearly cost an innocent man his life.

 

"John Thompson spent 14 years isolated on death row before the truth came to light," she said. He was innocent of the crimes that sent him to prison and prosecutors had "dishonored" their obligation to present the true facts to the jury, she said.

 

In the past, the high court has absolved trial prosecutors from any and all liability for the cases they bring to court. The key issue in the case of Connick vs. John Thompson was whether the district attorney could be held liable for a pattern of wrongdoing in his office and for his failure to see to it that his prosecutors followed the law.

 

In 1999, when all his appeals had failed on his conviction for the murder of a hotel executive, Thompson was scheduled to be put to death. But a private investigator hired by his lawyer found a blood test in the police lab that showed the man wanted for a related carjacking had type B blood, while Thompson's was type O.

 

Thompson had been charged with and convicted of an attempted carjacking near the Superdome as a prelude to charging him with the unsolved murder of a hotel executive.

 

The newly revealed blood test spared Thompson's life, and a judge ordered a new trial on the murder charge that had sent him to death row. His new defense lawyers found other evidence that had been hidden, including eyewitnesses reports. Bystanders reported seeing a man who was 6 feet tall with close-cropped hair running away holding a gun. Thompson was 5 feet 8 and had a bushy Afro.

 

With the new eyewitness reports and other evidence that pointed to another man as the killer, Thompson was quickly acquitted of all the charges in a second trial. He won $14 million in damages in a civil suit against the district attorney.

 

In rejecting the judgment, Justice Thomas described the case as a "single incident" in which mistakes were made. He said Thompson did not prove a pattern of similar violations that would justify holding the city's government liable for the wrongdoing. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined to form the majority.

 

However, Thompson's lawyers showed that at least four prosecutors knew about the hidden blood test. They also showed evidence of other, similar cases in New Orleans in which key evidence was concealed from defense lawyers.

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/30/nation/la-na-court-prosecutors-20110330

[Krawnka 282]

He won 14 million dollars, and had 14 years free room and board, and all the sex he probably didn't want......don't be greedy.

[Favre4Ever+ 4,476]

He won 14 million dollars, and had 14 years free room and board, and all the sex he probably didn't want......don't be greedy.

 

Yeah, I can see what you mean money wise... but still, the decision upsets me to a degree. And seeing that it split the supreme court bench, it obviously tore them apart as well.

 

And the free room and board and sec definitely sounds like a bargain.

[Krawnka 282]

Yeah, you can't buy back virginity....but 14 million bucks would help.

[CARDINAL 205]

This a very stupid decision by the Supreme Court. That man who spent 14 years of his life on death row should get compensation for those wasted years at the very least,plus an apology from anyone involved that made a mistake.

Edited April 12, 2011 by CARDINALOFWISDOM

[Guest Durant4MVP]

This a verystupid decision by the Supreme Court. That man who spent 14 years of his life on death row should get compensation for those wasted years at the very least,plus an apology from anyone involved that made a mistake.

 

For negging Krawnka and F4E because of some sarcastic comments, someone should rename you CardinalofStupidity

[CARDINAL 205]

For negging Krawnka and F4E because of some sarcastic comments, someone should rename you CardinalofStupidity

 

I know those were sarcastic comments you fuckin chink. I was expressing a comment based on the article thread that they posted.