Jump to content

Omerta

TGP Prime+
  • Content Count

    4,506
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    98

Posts posted by Omerta


  1. 1 hour ago, BwareDWare94 said:

    18 people is not enough to determine causation. Let's be honest here

    Theoretically you're right, when you're talkin about such a large sample size. That being said, I absolutely believe there are people in this world that are sick enough to kill somebody just for being who they are. I have no doubt that trans people have been killed just for the fact that they're trans. that is terrible, nobody should be killed for being who they are.

    What I don't appreciate is when it's being called a pandemic, or a crisis, just to rally the masses around to cause that doesn't really exist. It only exists in the sense that trans people are killed for being trans. That being said they're not killed for being trans anymore than a black person is killed for being black, or white person is killed for being white.

    We have more than enough existential crisis on our hands as both a nation and a global society, that we don't need to manufacture any.


  2. Telling me 18 people is a crisis is a terrible fucking statement. 

    I'm good, but I can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit.

    Out of 10 million, 18 die. Sounds like good odds, or almost like the best odds.

    Don't preach to me about black people being systematically poor, when there's a higher percentage that they become a millionaire, trans a trans person is murdered because they're trans.


  3. 13 minutes ago, Thanatos said:

    Yeah how dare they get upset at the rise in violence versus trans and gay people as this administration keeps pushing ass backwards ideas about said people. 

    Yep all 18 of them that were murdered. Gee whiz. I wish the murder rate in other groups was that low...like black people... 

    They can sit the fuck back down.


  4. That's the crazy part. We have to sensationalize everything and the outrage media factory picks it up and shoves it down our throats. 

    If the trans community is .03% of the population that puts them at 9,900,000. 18 people Is like .00000019% of that. So .00000019% of .03 % is an epidemic. If that's the case there is an epidemic of black millionaires, who knew. Fucking idiots. This is why it is so hard to take their horseshit serious.


  5. So our troops should keep dying for them? What are we fighting? Look, at the end of the day they are 25 to 30 million strong, ISIS is less than 100k. For any fighting force worth their salt, this is an easy fight. Either way, I'm more upset American troops have went from a shit mission, to a proud one, to a pointless one. 

    Americans are drying for absolutely no reason, that needs to stop. My loyalty outside of the big 3, it's to my brothers and sisters in arms and Americans before it is to a force that was provided the best help that any country could get for 20 FUCKING YEARS, and are still incompetent.

    I wish the people well, they were good to me, but I will never put them over Americans. It's time to end it occupation of the middle East.

    • Upvote 1

  6. 1 hour ago, seanbrock said:

    We're not fighting to win. We're fighting to make more munitions and bombs to keep the war machine going and We're fighting to keep that region in economic shambles so they can be easily taken advantage of by installing some puppet government lol. Countries like Saudi Arabia and UAE that cooperate don't get sanctioned or bombed. Also funny that Saudi Arabia and UAE...or private citizens in those countries sponsor terrorism. Makes you think doesn't it? Just like how we lost the Vietnam war but you can go stay at a nice resort in Vietnam for vacation :yao:

    I loathe talking about the Vietnam war. That said, we didn't lose. It's because a bunch of good-for-nothing pussy's back home who were too chickenshit decided that they were going to start espousing  the bullshit phrase that we lost. Just because it wasn't fought the way they wanted it to be fought, or that it was fought to begin with, doesn't mean we lost. I would have gone to prison in those days, because I absolutely would have killed anyone who would have spit on a US soldier. not at the time, but I would have waited until no clear motive was there, and then I would start whacking them one by one. They're the sorriest excuse for humanity I've ever seen in my life and it really is a true tragedy that I have to call them Americans. In my opinion, they should still be shot.

    • Like 1

  7. 18 minutes ago, Thanatos said:

    Interesting that you have that opinion. I haven't asked one of my friends, but every other military person I know is incensed over leaving the Kurds to die.

    But you didn't answer my question. What was that line meant to say? I'm curious now.

    We will abandon them in time anyway. That was the line.

    I would be for saving them if we actually got to win. This government has been putting our military in bad position after bad position and I'm tired of it.  

    Either fight to win or get our troops the fuck out.


  8. 4 hours ago, Thanatos said:

    I love playing "translate Ngata's crappy cell phone."

    "We bandit them in our fine" guys. What does it mean? Is it code? 

    Also the Kurds are not really allies? They helped us versus ISIS a lot. So we're just going to use them and lose them?

    It's the greatest phone ever says the fucking tech nerds at work. Get the new iPhones they said, they're great they said. My personal phone is a flip so I can't use this on it.

    Anywho. No, they're really not. I mean they like us but only because we don't try to kill them. And it's hardly use them and lose them. As far as ISIS, we were going to merc those sheep fuckers anyway. We have helped them more than they have us by an immeasurable amount. And it beats the alternative. Staying there until they can defense themselves competently... We would be there long after we're both dead and I'm in no hurry to do that.


  9. First, it has to happen like this. The people over there are so militarily incompetent, if we waited for them to get good, we would never be done.

    Second they're not really allies. They are friendly only because the enemy of my enemy is my friend. We bandit them in our fine. 

     

    Sink or swim peeps.


  10. That I actually believe. I know a couple psyops guys who work in shit like that. One is an "editor" for the media and I don't speak to him anymore. We just drifted apart which is better anyway because I couldn't fuck with someone in the least useful profession in the world.

    The other one is now working for a videogame company and never wrote code a day in his life lol. He is there for how those games effect the mind.


  11. 14 minutes ago, seanbrock said:

    You think it gets the coverage it deserves? As far as I know, Wenxer or Maxwell has given any testimony. Don't you think his "suicide" should be a little bit more of a scandal. I think Megan Markel gets more press lol.

    She does. That said people don't want to hear about corruption unless it's about Trump. That's the problem. We know he is corrupt but if he can expose more corruption why is that bad ?

    • Upvote 1

  12. It doesn't make them right, but it mean it won't stand in court which is my point. Don't move the goalposts now. And your opinion is more valid then everyone else's?

    There is no point in talking because you REFUSE to see Biden may be guilty too. EVERYONE HERE has said he is a piece of shit who is most likely guilty. We want to know what Biden did as well. So if there is no point in talking then it is because you won't admit maybe, just maybe, not all Democrats are saints. And throwing up these hail Marys to make the rest of us look like we're defending Trump is full on Blots shit.


  13. 2 minutes ago, Thanatos said:

    This is the exact bullshit I'm talking about. Thank you for posting it so we can deal with this nonsense. First off, obligatory lmaoSaavedra. Anyone at the Daily Wire is nothing as a source or a journalist. That webzine is nothing more than a cesspool.

    Secondly, this prosecutor was going to be fired, Ukraine had told us as much, because the man was corrupt as hell. This post lays it out, and I encourage you to read it. It's not biased towards Biden, but it does explain Viktor Pshonka, the prosecutor-general (links are at the bottom) https://imgur.com/gallery/Xu86rtk

    Biden is not doing this of his own accord. This is the Obama admin pressuring Ukraine to fire a corrupt prosecutor. The right wing nutcases continue to make it out like Biden is going after him because of the case versus the company his son worked at. A case that had gone nowhere for two years and was completely stalled out. This part, of course, they leave out because it doesn't fit their conspiracy narrative.

     

    So him saying it, is proof he didn't. Got it.

    • Haha 1

  14. Well that's a dumb position to take. It is not whataboutism when we are indeed wondering if one of the parties involved actually did anything wrong.  How is that whataboutism when the person we are talking about is involved. You're smarter than that. Just because all YOU want to talk about is Trump does not mean we have to follow suit.

    Second the texts are exactly what I am talking about. You are connecting the dots you want. Not saying you're wrong, but that is far from proof. A mixed jury comes back not guilty or hung Everytime unless there are 12 of you. Judging by the poll Favre quoted about 6 would not buy it either.

    Third. Don't name call people for pointing out your wrong. It's pointless. You have come a.long way but you still can't admit that maybe other people have a point and your way is not the only one 

  • Chatbox

    TGP has moved to Discord (sorta) - https://discord.gg/JkWAfU3Phm

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×