Let Westbrook be Westbrook

[Guest Phailadelphia]

Some folks here need to read this.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/blog/eye-on-basketball/19331628

 

Let Westbrook be Westbrook

 

By Matt Moore | Senior NBA Blogger

 

There is an old saying that goes "You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you are not entitled to the fruits of action."

 

Welecome to the life of Russell Westbrook.

 

Westbrook is, has been, and will be throughout the course of these Finals the difference between the Thunder simply being one more superstar loaded with a good supporting player and decent role players and a juggernaut contender for the NBA title. There is, in no uncertain terms, a vast misunderstanding of Westbrook and what he provides the Thunder. Entering the Finals, it's time for the "come to Jesus" talk.

 

No more asking for him to defer more, to simply surrender the ball on every possession to Kevin Durant, to be more of a traditional point guard and less of the speed demon he is. Quit trying to pressure Westbrook into fading away from what has made not only his game, but the Thunder successful in order to fulfill some nebulous, archaic, and largely parodoxical concept about alpha dogs.

 

Let Westbrook be Westbrook.

 

Westbrook is never going to be the pass-first pure point that everyone wants him to be. He's not going to be CP3 or Rondo. His internal diagnostics are constantly set to "kill" mode on the court. He is fearless to the point of recklessness, aggressive sometimes to a fault, and as confident in his scoring abilities as any player in the NBA, and I mean any NBA player.

 

And it works.

 

You think this is all Durant? That the lanky shooter who is without question the best offensive player in the league but who also still struggles from time to time in establishing position could have taken them this far on his own? We criticize LeBron (note: it is now impossible to write about anything without comparing it to LeBron) for having sought out help, while asking for Westbrook to be less of a weapon. We sing the praises of Harden's efficiency, while overlooking that while passing less than in previous years, Westbrook had a higher PER than Harden this season. (Note: PER also rewards high-volume shooters who rebound, which pretty much means it was built for Westbrook, but let's not go too far down that road.)

 

Without Westbrook, the Thunder are a faster-paced, worse-defensively Cleveland Cavaliers in 2009. No, seriously. Harden is better than Mo Williams was that season in efficiency and percentages, but the role is similar, the production is similar, the team construct is similar. Westbrook is what James was in need of all those years. Fearless, relentless, able to create his own shot and athletic as any player, ever.

 

There have been no conflicts in OKC over the things everyone talks about, no shouts from Kevin Durant about Westbrook's willingness to let it fly. There are no signs of internal dischord or that he team is angry with Westbrook's aggressiveness in looking for his own shot. You need multiple players able to create their own offense. Westbrook is.

 

Now, can he do so, to a fault? Absolutely. What makes him brilliant is what gets him in trouble. Westbrook is among the players in the league that I qualify as playing in "Hate Mode." There are guys who approach the game with a fun and passion for the sports that make it beautiful. LeBron. Durant. Rubio. Brian Cardinal. You know, the greats.

 

Then there are guys who look like their only mission in life is to destroy everything in front of them and punish the world for having ever crossed or douted them. Rajon Rondo is the de facto president of his group. Westbrook is Secretary of State. He plays with a viciousness that acts as kind of a contrast to Durant. Durant, the fun-loving, good-hearted shooter with ice in his veins, Westbrook the pretty hate machine that detonates whenever he sees an opening.

 

In the Heat we have a team where the biggest problem can be their tentativeness, their unwillingness to engage offensively. And yet on the other side, Westbrook is critized for being relentless in his attack. Do not be confused, Westbrook can pass. He's added this season a deadly component, the drive, ball-fake and up-under scoop pass. He's created five dunks for Serge Ibaka at least that I've seen this postseason with that move. He's got the drive and kick. He's got the lob, of course. But if you leave that lane open, if you don't get back in transition, if you try and go under that screen in the key, he's going to go for your throat. We should celebrate, not denigrate, that kind of willingness to make your own fate.

 

There's been a subtle shift this year from Westbrook. The aggressivenes is there, the mistakes have been tempered. He has, time and again, made it clear he understands Durant needs the ball late in the game. At the same time, he's passing less (his assist rate is down 12.8 percent), scoring more. The criticism has actually fueled him to be an even better scorer. He's taken over games to get them back into it or to take the lead in the late third and early fourth quarters. (His work in the third quarter of the Spurs series was nothing short of masterful.) He has his role, important and prominent and often brilliant on this team. But he no longer is so fired up that he's sacrificing the team at the altar of aggression.

 

...

 

Well, not all the time.

 

Look, he's not going to change. He won't become this other player that people dream of him being. What's maybe the most impressive thing about this Thunder team is that they don't ask him to be. There are no leaks to reporters about wishing they had a pure point, there's no sings of Durant expressing distrust or disgust. They're a tight knit group, and Westbrook's near-violent approach to offense is part of their success. They understand that.

 

It's also mistifying due to how the Thunder's offense is built. With a pure point, would Serge Ibaka get more dunks? Yes. But Durant? Durant works mostly from isolation, face-up out of the post catch, or on the cut. He's not a catch and shoot player very often. He needs rhythm, and while we can say the same things about Carmelo Anthony, Durant's willingness to pass makes him that much smarter of an overall player. Westbrook is the spark, the intiator for the offense many times. He's also the biggest victimizer of a defense's lack of focus. Westbrooks' brilliance is in that attack when the game has settled into a rhythm, the opponent makes or misses, and there's just a slight delay in getting back. The next thing you know, Westbrook has gotten the step and it's to the rim he goes.

 

Are these things possible with CP3? Sure. With Rondo? Absolutely, provided that there's someone for Rondo to pass it to once he gets to the rim when there's even a remote possibility of him being sent to the line, but whatever. But to say the team would be better with those players and not Westbrook?

 

...

 

They're in the Finals! How much better to do you expect them to be?

 

But it doesn't "feel" right, so we complain. We tear down Westbrook while absolving Durant. In a way, the two teams meeting in the Finals have opposite dynamics. LeBron James is the biggest star and no matter how badly Dwyane Wade plays, James gets the criticism. Kevin Durant is the biggest star and no matter how passively he plays, it falls on Westbrook to have done more to set him up. It's as if the expectation is for Westbrook to dribble the ball while picking Durant up and helping him establish position with the other hand, then gently placing it in his hands. This isn't to try a knock the best offensive player in the league's game. Durant is the better player by miles. But he can't get the ball every time. It's not how basketball works. Well, outside of New York.

 

In wins for the Thunder in the regular season, Westbrook shot 21.7 field goal attempts per 36 minutes. In losses? 21.9 field goal attempts per 36 minutes. In the playoffs, losses have yielded 22.3 FGA per 36 whilw ins 20.2, but considering the Thunder have only lost three times, and two were in fast-paced, high-offense games against the Spurs, it's kind of hard to make a jump that Westbrook shooting is bad for the Thunder. They've come to terms with it. It's probably time that we do, too.

 

I've criticized Westbrook when he's barrelled into opponents drawing charges late in games in past years. I've questioned his ability to harness his emotions, to control his desire to be "the guy." But his natural growth, no huge changes, just the normal, predictable development of his game into a more mature player has yielded better production, better decisions, and more wins.

 

The Thunder don't need a different point guard. They don't need a different Westbrook. They've won the Western Conference with the combustible, uncontainable, zero-to-sixty-in-two-point-oh Russell Westbrook. They have what they need. Westbrok will continue to do the work, and not get the fruits of that work. If they win the title, it will be on Kevin Durant's shoulders. Every shot will be questioned, every mistake over-amplified. But in the end, the Thunder will continue to do what has brought them to the very cups of a championship.

 

Let Westbrook be Westbrook.

[Zack_of_Steel+ 3,014]

I agree with the article. I've never said that Westbrook needs to turn into Rondo. However, I do stand by the fact that he needs to realize when his shots are not falling and others' are. He can't waste 5 straight possessions by sprinting down to the wing or elbow and tossing up a brick. He can't waste possessions on continually driving in transition, not looking to pass at all, when the other team is not fouling.

 

His game works, but like the author said, it does have its faults at times. If he's gone 2-10 through the first three quarters and has only been fouled once or twice, I'd say that he should be more willing to pass to Harden or Durant if they've got only a handful of misses between them like we saw in Game 2 of the WCF.

[BwareDWare94 723]

I say just start Harden at PG and Westbrook at 2 next year. Hell, Jason Terry will be on the market and may sign somewhere cheap for another ring. Let him be the sixth man scorer.

 

After OKC wins this title, and they will, there will be several useful veterans to pursue who might sign on for a reasonable price (Terry, Captain Jack). This team's weakest link is its bench, and while it's a decent bench, it's not deep enough for scoring or defense. Terry brings scoring, Jackson brings defense and excellent three point shooting.

[56AceInDaPlace 110]

I say just start Harden at PG and Westbrook at 2 next year. Hell, Jason Terry will be on the market and may sign somewhere cheap for another ring. Let him be the sixth man scorer.

 

After OKC wins this title, and they will, there will be several useful veterans to pursue who might sign on for a reasonable price (Terry, Captain Jack). This team's weakest link is its bench, and while it's a decent bench, it's not deep enough for scoring or defense. Terry brings scoring, Jackson brings defense and excellent three point shooting.

 

They wont start Westbrook at SG when hes not a better shooter then Harden. Besides, Sefolosha brings balance to the starting lineup. Him and Ibaka and Perkin are the defense while Durant and Westbrook score. Taking him out of the line for Harden is dumb. You have 3 scorers on the floor at once. Harden would be good at running the floor at PG but too many shoot first type players on the floor. You have to think of chemistry and defense. Sefolosha should start, he plays tough D and has the corner three. Ibaka will get better on offense and so will Durant, Westbrook, Harden. Those 4 are OKC core. They have chemistry and they are in the finals. If it aint broke dont fix it. Now if they lose somebody they could bring someone in. But Terry and Harden off the bench? Could they stay happy with PT? I say if they can maintain the same team next yr besides a few bench players dont bother.

[BwareDWare94 723]

They wont start Westbrook at SG when hes not a better shooter then Harden. Besides, Sefolosha brings balance to the starting lineup. Him and Ibaka and Perkin are the defense while Durant and Westbrook score. Taking him out of the line for Harden is dumb. You have 3 scorers on the floor at once. Harden would be good at running the floor at PG but too many shoot first type players on the floor. You have to think of chemistry and defense. Sefolosha should start, he plays tough D and has the corner three. Ibaka will get better on offense and so will Durant, Westbrook, Harden. Those 4 are OKC core. They have chemistry and they are in the finals. If it aint broke dont fix it. Now if they lose somebody they could bring someone in. But Terry and Harden off the bench? Could they stay happy with PT? I say if they can maintain the same team next yr besides a few bench players dont bother.

 

Either way, they need to at least tempt Captain Jack to come over. He can play defense like Sefalosha and imagine their small lineup of Harden, Westbrook, Jack, Durant, and [insert post here]--Holy shit.

[56AceInDaPlace 110]

Either way, they need to at least tempt Captain Jack to come over. He can play defense like Sefalosha and imagine their small lineup of Harden, Westbrook, Jack, Durant, and [insert post here]--Holy shit.

 

If he signed for cheap im sure hed start. But thats a if. At the moment i dont think they need any help. Specially if they win the finals.

[BwareDWare94 723]

If he signed for cheap im sure hed start. But thats a if. At the moment i dont think they need any help. Specially if they win the finals.

 

They're one injury to a 10-15 point scorer away from being massively depleted because of their lack of scoring on the bench.

 

The worst thing this team could do over the offseason is stand pat. Nazr Muhammed could be cut or not resigned, depending on his contract, freeing up an open space.

 

They also need to decide if Cole Aldrich is worth a damn.

Edited June 11, 2012 by BwareDWare94

[Guest Phailadelphia]

They're one injury to a 10-15 point scorer away from being massively depleted because of their lack of scoring on the bench.

 

 

That's the same for pretty much any team.

 

OKC doesn't have any pressing needs. They have a couple of draft picks playing in Europe right now, one of which is a 6'9" PF with a post game. They don't necessarily need to go out looking for players to fill nonexistent holes.

[Zack_of_Steel+ 3,014]

They also need to decide if Cole Aldrich is worth a damn.

 

I can't speak for all Thunder fans, but I love his attitude and the way he plays off the bench. He puts effort into every minute he gets. He boxes out on every rebound and plays pretty good defense, imo.

[BwareDWare94 723]

I can't speak for all Thunder fans, but I love his attitude and the way he plays off the bench. He puts effort into every minute he gets. He boxes out on every rebound and plays pretty good defense, imo.

 

Maybe he's at that point where he just needs Brooks to play him a little bit, so he can get into a rhythm. At the same time, he's essentially every other Thunder big if he can't score some points. They need one to score. It looks like Ibaka is developing into that, but if Aldrich can provide 8-12 off the bench, that'd be pretty damn nice.

[Guest Phailadelphia]

Breaking down Westbrook's brilliant performance in Game 1:

http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2012/06/13/russell-westbrook-11-different-kinds-of-smoke/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

[Bucman 891]

Westbrook doesn't need to turn into Rondo. Rondo has no jump shot at all. Westbrook just needs to be more mindful of his shot selection.