Vin+ 3,121 Posted September 22, 2012 When your line isn't helping you and your WR's aren't getting seperation downfield, what do you want him to do? This is the biggest thing. Last week was a group effort of suck and can't just be pinned on Gabbert. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
housemd 338 Posted September 23, 2012 Big Ben is a good QB. however i do think Herb Taylor and Guy whimper are both worse than any Pittsburgh Olinemen also Note that Ben is an ELITE QB while Blaine is a Young QB who still doesnt have Much QB Experience in the NFL and College. You described Guy Whimper in this thread like he's a handicaped moron or plays football in his free time..He's certainly not worse than Legursky or Kemoeatu.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
56AceInDaPlace 110 Posted September 23, 2012 (edited) You described Guy Whimper in this thread like he's a handicaped moron or plays football in his free time..He's certainly not worse than Legursky or Kemoeatu.. Whimper has no technique hes sloppy with his footwork. Edited September 23, 2012 by 56AceInDaPlace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vin+ 3,121 Posted September 23, 2012 Whimper gave up 14 sacks in 15 games last season (which was the most in the league). I'd say he holds the advantage in suck over Kemoeatu and Legursky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CampinWithaMissingPerson 2,025 Posted September 27, 2012 Whimper gave up 14 sacks in 15 games last season (which was the most in the league). I'd say he holds the advantage in suck over Kemoeatu and Legursky. This. He's so bad at playing tackle that his career highlight isn't stoning a DE or making a great block, it's a catch and run on a PA roll out on Monday Night Football when the game is out of hand: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted September 27, 2012 Whimper gave up 14 sacks in 15 games last season (which was the most in the league). I'd say he holds the advantage in suck over Kemoeatu and Legursky. I dont know man, legursky is seriously one of the worst O lineman I have ever seen and watching the Ravens-Jags game form last year your beloved RT is by far better than Legursky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TDJacksonville 31 Posted September 28, 2012 I dont know man, legursky is seriously one of the worst O lineman I have ever seen and watching the Ravens-Jags game form last year your beloved RT is by far better than Legursky. Whimper statisticly is the worst starting Linemen in the NFL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
housemd 338 Posted October 10, 2012 1. 2. 3. 3. I can't decide whether to put Jags or Titans at #4..Leaning towards Titans,probably.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
housemd 338 Posted October 15, 2012 1. Rodgers raped the shit out of them with 6 TD's and the best defense in AFC hasn't looked that good at all(except JJ Watt)..Still,they remain #1 in this division and I don't see that changing in next few weeks.. 2. After an epic win against Green Bay,they looked awful yesterday..I'm still not putting them lower but I think that will change after Week 7.. 3. I must say I was impressed by the way this team held us in that tough game..They should go up after Week 7 as I think the win against Steelers has given them more confidence and they aren't lolTitans anymore.. 4. Bye week.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oochymp 2,393 Posted October 15, 2012 here's my (probably biased) opinion, though really the bottom three are pretty interchangeable: 1. - the space below them indicates how far entrenched in the #1 spot in the divisional power rankings they are 2. - here's some may think my bias comes in, but they looked good in that win over the Steelers, the only question is does it say more about us or more about the Steelers? 3. - okay, good win against the Packers, but power rankings are all about what have you done lately, and what they've done lately is get destroyed by the Jets 4. - outside of the game against the Colts this team hasn't looked good at all and with Oakland, Green Bay, and Detroit coming out of the bye it's not looking up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
housemd 338 Posted October 15, 2012 2. - here's some may think my bias comes in, but they looked good in that win over the Steelers, the only question is does it say more about us or more about the Steelers? That is exactly what I asked myself after Thursday night..The thing is,the Titans really looked good in that game and that's a sign of improvement after all those painful losses..As for the Steelers,I think that game has shown us that we haven't taken some "easy" games seriously(Raiders,Titans) and that we should do our best no matter who our opponent is.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Glanvilles Grits 142 Posted October 17, 2012 Hey, where's that guy that was saying the Jaguars had one of the best defenses in the league and would be contenders this year? I believe that was his way of reasoning as to why they took a punter early in the draft. Did he disappear? I'm not even sure I remember who it was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thanatos 2,847 Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) He was banned for the extreme homerism and his constant attacks on other people. That was jagsfan4lyfe or something like that. Edited October 18, 2012 by Thanatos19 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
