BwareDWare94 723 Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) Let's talk about our "stop shaming" culture. I mean, certain things like "slutshaming" are not OK under any circumstances, but for fuck's sake, some snowflake just took that word "shaming" and ran with it. Whiny liberal mouthbreather says, "stop shaming me/other people for their own poor decisions." Logical person says, "that's ridiculous--this is a problem and we need to address it." Whiny liberal mouthbreather says, "Ok, I'm going to publicly ruin your reputation because you won't bow to my crybaby demands." I literally had a friend from a college, a 30+ year old man, go on a Facebook tirade about being shamed for "not liking to eat breakfast in the morning." Now, this isn't necessarily a "poor decision" as outlined above, but it's an indicator of how far out of line this whining has gotten. I'm still going to vote primarily Democrat, but I can't handle these modern mainstream liberals anymore. What a bunch of self-absorbed twats with no perspective on our nation's and culture's real problems. Edited June 4, 2017 by BwareDWare94 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BJORN 679 Posted June 4, 2017 Ha! He doesn't eat breakfast?! What an idiot! 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) Why is slut shaming not OK ? If you are a whore, that is not attractive. I dont want to be where 10,000 other dudes dicks have been. Why is this bad ? Is it bad to want the person you are with not have slept with a bunch of people and have all the baggage that comes with it ? I am not saying stone these people in the streets or anything, but why is it bad when a dude is like," Your crotch probably has the genetic material of the entire Ravens roster in it, I'll pass" Calling people intolerant for that is incredibly arrogant in my opinion. That said we live in a society where you cant have a set of standards unless it matches either the republican or democrat moral list, which is hilarious because both parties are so morally bankrupt that if you go against them both you should feel as though you are doing it right. I am not saying go out of your way to make them suffer I am just saying why is it not ok for a dude or chick to say," you've fucked a lot of people, I am not feeling like you and are going ot work." Edited June 4, 2017 by Omerta 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thanatos 2,847 Posted June 4, 2017 That's not slut shaming. Slut shaming is society's tendency to look on a girl who sleeps with a lot of guys as a slut, whereas they look at a guy who sleeps with a lot of girls as a stud. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) That's not slut shaming. Slut shaming is society's tendency to look on a girl who sleeps with a lot of guys as a slut, whereas they look at a guy who sleeps with a lot of girls as a stud. That is true though, you sleep with a lot of dudes and you are a slut. Now to the man thing, I have been around a lot of dudes and a lot of dudes who pride themselves on pulling patch, and I have literally never heard them adored. Yeah I mean they can pull a lot of patch, but it is not like we would sit around telling stories of his legend. If the chick was fine as hell we would say, "That chick was fucking banging" or something but it was never like he would slap hands through the hallway out to P.T. for how many women he banged. Chicks that bang a hell of a lot of dudes are slutty, it is kind of in the name. Why is it not ok to look out for yourself and others you know by saying that a woman who fucks a lot of dudes is a slut. I would think smart people do that. If a woman sees a dude fucking a lot of chicks she better get the word out so that way she can protect herself from STD's. Slutshaming as the definition I have looked up on the webs, does not exist. It is just a stupid word someone made up because they are ashamed of their bad choices and dont want to be called to the carpet. Edited June 4, 2017 by Omerta 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ATL_Predator+ 1,196 Posted June 4, 2017 Ladies are supposed to have class as the completing gender to the savage male. If they are a slut it's unlady like... if a man sleeps around with a lot of women, he is just acting on his savage nature. If a whore is a whore, I have no problem with calling that cunt out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RazorStar 4,025 Posted June 4, 2017 Well there's a difference between a woman who enjoys sex and a woman who'll sleep with anything and everything, and that difference just isn't reflected by society. A girl who has had three romantic partners and slept with all of them is fair game to be called a slut by people, even though that's not really fair,she's been in relationships with all of them. Sex isn't really a despicable act, so there's no reason to hate someone for it, unless they do it without someone's consent. That's basically how I see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 5, 2017 Well there's a difference between a woman who enjoys sex and a woman who'll sleep with anything and everything, and that difference just isn't reflected by society. A girl who has had three romantic partners and slept with all of them is fair game to be called a slut by people, even though that's not really fair,she's been in relationships with all of them. Sex isn't really a despicable act, so there's no reason to hate someone for it, unless they do it without someone's consent. That's basically how I see it. I agree with that if we are allowed to frame it. If a girl has 3 1 day relationships her case isnt great. If she she has had 3 over a period of time or extenuating circumstances like she had 3 in a year but one was killed or something then whatevs. That said those broads who act slutty at "slut walks" (because that proves a point lolfeminists) to show how there is no such thing as sluts is hilarious. I am in a agreement with you that they are allowed to have as much sex as they want and hopefully dont just like it, but love it. That said if you are sleeping around regardless of how much you love it and have multiple partners a week for several weeks you're a slut, there is no pretty way to put it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Also, does anybody know how shaming began or what the actual criteria is instead of absolving whiny people of their poor choices ? What is this shaming thing ACTUALLY about? I don't remember anything about it growing up, iif you were the fat kid, the dork, the whatever you got made fun of. I am ok with a LITTLE jostling for everyone, it helps develop thick skin imo, but I think bullying is very wrong. There is no need to make someones existence miserable for your own enjoyment and is definitely wrong. Was there a case, or a famous incident, or anything that brought this to the forefront? Like Trigglypuff, and the triggering. To me that is what I look to for when triggering was at its apex. What is an example of the apex of "_________ Shaming" Edited June 5, 2017 by Omerta Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blotsfan 2,112 Posted June 5, 2017 I'm not really sure what this thread is supposed to be about. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) I'm not really sure what this thread is supposed to be about. In a nutshell...Crybullies. The difficulty in having conversation with a random person without "shaming" some group of people who feel as though people referencing them by the sum total of their decisions is shaming them. In the OP's specific example somebody got breakfast shamed for not liking to eat breakfast. It seems fairly innocuous but it is insidious because people get to use the word shaming to absolve them of their poos decisions made. As an example: Fuck multiple partners a week=slut eat poorly and are sedentary and are overweight as a result=fat eat like shit=you eat like shit. These are all bad things brought on by bad choices and when people tell you so, it is not shaming. When a doctor tells you, you need to eat better and exercise to prolong your life and enhance the quality of your life, he is not fatshaming. Get off the couch, enjoy the outdoors and make a concerted to eat better. If you eat 8 cans of canned cheese, 10,000 oreos, and wash it down with Ben and Jerrys heart attack in a tub deluxe EVERYDAY, you eat like shit, it is not food shaming. If you fuck a new dude every day or every other day, you are a slut. These are not opinions, they are definitions to words. This is what the thread is about, people who take things to far and are not wanting to be held accountable for their poor decisions. I think the OP is trying to bring to light that none of these things make you a bad person, however, some of these traits might make you less appealing to be around, and it is not the fault of the guy who is at the pinnacle of health and loves the outdoors to not want to hang out with the sedentary guy. He is not fatshaming, he just leads a different lifestyle and he does not want to waste his time hanging out with people who are not into the same things. It is the choice of everyone how fit we are, how we act, talk, treat others and someone calling out our flaws are not shaming us, just making observations. To put it simply : https://wanderlust-mag.com/2014/08/31/5-types-of-shaming-that-women-need-to-stop-doing-to-each-other/ Most of the things in this article dont exist, never have, and never will except to over sensitive people who dont want to be accountable. That classy dame with cotton candy hair who talks with such vulgarity, is upset that she bangs a lot of people and she is labeled a slut. She is right it is her genitals and she can do as she pleases, as are the minds of the people who judge her and they can do as they wish with it. She may well in fact be a slut. Edited June 5, 2017 by Omerta 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sarge+ 3,436 Posted June 5, 2017 ^ I wish I were able to + that post 100 times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Milla4Prez63 678 Posted June 5, 2017 I agree with the notion that if a woman sleeps with a lot of partners, she is a slut. But I personally have zero issues and wouldn't "shame" or whatever you want to call it a woman for that choice. Because as long as you're being safe and not risking disease I think that's a completly acceptable life choice and there is NOTHING wrong with it. There is also nothing wrong with a man not wanting to be with a slutty woman because again that's a personal choice. But I don't think these women should feel bad for their decisions at all, if they love sex then good for them love it and love life. Just be smart and safe and don't risk ending your life prematurely with an STD.As for the topic at hand, I think it's great that people are pushing to become open minded and accepting of other people and different life styles. It's a good step towards a likely unrealistic goal of peace among humanity. I do think things are fair game for jokes and fun at times though, there's a fine line between being a good person who accepts others and being overly sensitive and crying at anything mildly offensive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BwareDWare94 723 Posted June 5, 2017 Slutshaming is not the proper term. What it actually refers to is referring to any women who enjoys sex as a slut, or it can also refer to the act of victim blaming when people try to act like revealing clothing or the act of drinking/drug use caused a sexual assault. Predators are the only cause of sexual assault, period. That is slutshaming, but the title itself implies something completely different. Multiple partners constantly for either sex should be looked down upon because it's dangerous, self-absorbed, and horribly reckless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Slutshaming is not the proper term. What it actually refers to is referring to any women who enjoys sex as a slut, or it can also refer to the act of victim blaming when people try to act like revealing clothing or the act of drinking/drug use caused a sexual assault. Predators are the only cause of sexual assault, period. That is slutshaming, but the title itself implies something completely different. Multiple partners constantly for either sex should be looked down upon because it's dangerous, self-absorbed, and horribly reckless. That is a tricky subject, is how drunk is too drunk. If they are passed obviously you need to keep on moving but if you are at a bar and are both drunk but just the "having a good time" drunk, is it sexual assault ? If so can a man claim he was raped too if he was drunk so that way it is mutually assured destruction, or just the woman. Now I dont think the way a woman dresses can ever give consent to sex....EVER. That said if she dresses like a slut. well...you might be a slut. I know in high school chicks dressed up for "Halloween" when it was just in fact who can dress like the biggest skank was super popular among both. The sad part is only a few were classy, funny, or clever, the others were in fact sluts. There is a reason if a woman dresses a certain way and stands on a street corner she is solicited for services. That is because for years that was the attire of a pro whore. Edited June 5, 2017 by Omerta Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Milla4Prez63 678 Posted June 5, 2017 Multiple partners constantly for either sex should be looked down upon because it's dangerous, self-absorbed, and horribly reckless. I'm going to disagree with this heavily. It could be dangerous for sure, but driving a car is more likely to end your life than something sexual related. A lot of people are really reckless drivers, but driving is looked down upon. Sex is a natural and pleasurable experience that people should enjoy as they please as long as it's between two consenting adults. It's up to the individual on how smart/careful you want to be about it, but I don't think it should be looked down upon at all. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BwareDWare94 723 Posted June 5, 2017 I'm going to disagree with this heavily. It could be dangerous for sure, but driving a car is more likely to end your life than something sexual related. A lot of people are really reckless drivers, but driving is looked down upon. Sex is a natural and pleasurable experience that people should enjoy as they please as long as it's between two consenting adults. It's up to the individual on how smart/careful you want to be about it, but I don't think it should be looked down upon at all. Let me rephrase--multiple partners without ever using protection should be looked down upon. I get it--everybody hates condoms, but be careful if you can't know if the other person is clean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Warhorse 132 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Wow...that was awesome....I spent 15 minutes crafting a fkg response and all that posted was one word. Edited June 5, 2017 by Warhorse 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Favre4Ever+ 4,476 Posted June 5, 2017 I like park shaming people. Taking pictures and shaming people who go to park and take up two spots instead of one. They deserve it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ATL_Predator+ 1,196 Posted June 5, 2017 I think another aspect of this too is that if a girl is just looking for sex and STATES CLEARLY that she has no desire for a relationship.. she's a slut but a tolerable one. Now if a girl is in a committed relationship with another man and she starts sleeping around with multiple guys and gets caught? I think that we reach a new definition for the term slut, and react totally different than the first girl I was talking about... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Omerta+ 1,206 Posted June 6, 2017 I like what Donny pointed out. If she tells you she is not looking for a relationship from jump street, then even if she fucks a lot of dudes so what. Even if she is a slut I have got no issue with it as long as she is up front. I mean zero, like I could still chill with her, I just wont be taking her home to meet the folks if ya know what I mean. Same with dude, if you want to fuck a lot of dudes, its cool, just dont be mad when some girl who is looking for more sends your playa ass back to the bullpen with all the other dudes who arent trying to have more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BwareDWare94 723 Posted June 6, 2017 I now know why most of us are single lol. Can't tell the truth about women or you're unattractive and sexist, apparently Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seanbrock 1,684 Posted June 6, 2017 It's probably social conditioning to make it easier to manipulate people's opinion's and distract them from real things. I know most of you probably think I'm crazy when I say shit like this which is why I haven't posted in this topic yet but manipulation of public opinion is something that is taken very very seriously by the government and the plutocrats. They've gotten very sophisticated at it after the centuries with developments in psychology. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cherry 1,302 Posted June 6, 2017 Thread theme for all you single gents. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OSUViking 505 Posted June 14, 2017 I'm forever single. Either can't find someone who I can engage with or the people I feel a connection with don't reciprocate it. Don't give a damn about promiscuity, but at this point I'd probably steer clear. I've tried to be strict about not judging lifestyles different than mine, but I just don't want to fuck with the potential health risks. If we can conclude we're both safe, then I'd have no issue with a relationship. I still highly value whether I'm physically attracted or not, but that just opens the door. As long as I can have engaging and beneficial interactions with a girl, then why not take a chance? I don't think I can write off any single personality, because everyone is different once you get beyond the group think and such. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites